When selecting a commercial roofing solution, energy efficiency is often a top priority. Both silicone coatings and TPO roofing systems are considered cool roofing technologies, but they function differently and offer unique advantages depending on the building’s structure, climate, and long-term goals. Here’s how they compare.
Reflectivity Ratings of Silicone vs. TPO
Both silicone and TPO roofing materials have high reflectivity ratings, meaning they bounce solar heat away from the roof surface. TPO typically boasts initial solar reflectance in the 0.80–0.87 range, while silicone coatings generally range from 0.75–0.85 depending on the brand and color. In terms of immediate reflectivity, both systems perform well—TPO may have a slight edge at installation.
Impact on Cooling Costs and HVAC Load
Because both systems reduce rooftop heat absorption, they help lower indoor temperatures and reduce HVAC usage during peak seasons. TPO membranes are known for helping building owners reduce cooling costs in sunny regions, while silicone coatings are especially effective at improving performance on aging roofs with ponding water or degraded reflectivity. Either option can lead to significant monthly utility savings.
Performance in High-Heat Environments
TPO roofing performs well in dry, high-sun environments but can be more sensitive to UV degradation over time if not installed properly. Silicone, on the other hand, is naturally UV-stable and maintains its reflective qualities longer, even in extreme temperatures. This makes silicone a better fit for hot, humid climates or buildings exposed to constant sun.
Longevity of Reflective Properties Over Time
One of the key differences lies in long-term performance. TPO membranes may gradually lose reflectivity as dirt and debris accumulate or as the surface degrades. Silicone coatings are more resistant to weathering and maintain their brightness and reflectivity longer without chalking or fading. They also resist the buildup of dust and organic material better than TPO.
Contribution to LEED or Energy Star Credits
Both systems contribute to LEED and Energy Star requirements. TPO qualifies based on its high reflectance and emissivity values, often used in new construction to meet building code efficiency standards. Silicone coatings, when used as a restoration method, offer sustainable benefits by reducing landfill waste and extending roof life—making them a valuable tool for retrofit projects seeking LEED points.
Conclusion
For new construction or fully rebuilt roofing systems, TPO may offer slightly better reflectivity out of the box and strong performance with proper maintenance. For restorations or buildings with ponding issues, silicone coatings provide a longer-lasting, UV-stable solution that resists degradation over time. Both systems improve energy efficiency—but the right choice depends on your building’s condition, goals, and climate.
Ridgeline Roofing and Solar offers both TPO installations and silicone roof coatings to meet your unique needs. If you’re located in Joplin, MO, Bentonville, AR, or Grove, OK, contact us today for a FREE consultation and let us help you choose the most energy-efficient solution for your commercial building.